Content deleted Content added
link to peer review page |
→Lead and distributed element model: new section |
||
Line 29:
{{ping|Miniapolis}} Why have you removed the reference to "constructive interference", but left in "destructive interference". They are the complements of each other. [[User:Spinningspark|<b style="background:#FAFAD2;color:#C08000">Spinning</b>]][[User talk:Spinningspark|<b style="color:#4840A0">Spark</b>]] 21:50, 25 December 2018 (UTC)
:Sorry; I didn't know that interference could be anything other than negative. [[User:Miniapolis|'''''<span style="color:navy">Mini</span>''''']][[User_talk:Miniapolis|'''''<span style="color:#8B4513">apolis</span>''''']] 02:35, 26 December 2018 (UTC)
== Lead and distributed element model ==
The attempts to work in [[distributed element model]] into the lead have resulted in very ungainly wording. The current wording {{xt|...such as capacitors, inductors, and transformers, as implemented by the distributed element model}} is just a disaster. That sounds like capacitors etc (lumped elements) are implemented by the DE model. First of all, the DE model doesn't implement anything. Rather, it models an implementation, and it most certainly doesn't implement a capacitor, which is a lumped component.
I get the desire to have this in the lead, but really, there is no pressing need for a mention of modelling in the lead at all. It is not essential to helping the reader get a grip on what this article is about. Unless there is some better wording suggested, I intend to remove it. [[User:Spinningspark|<b style="background:#FAFAD2;color:#C08000">Spinning</b>]][[User talk:Spinningspark|<b style="color:#4840A0">Spark</b>]] 17:43, 7 April 2019 (UTC)
| |||