Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/RexxS: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
m Protected "Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/RexxS": to do the paperwork for moving to a crat chat ([Edit=Require administrator access] (indefinite) [Move=Require administrator access] (indefinite)) |
→Support: Just fixing my typo, no change |
||
Line 306:
#'''Support''' – I hope this does go to a 'crat chat and that significant consideration is given to disregarding opposes based on the nominator, timing, and concerns that are trivial. RexxS is a long-standing editor who has contributed substantially, and there is little evidence presented of a likelihood to misuse the tools. Civility concerns are reasonable, but speaking directly is appropriate at times and hopefully RexxS will take care not to be bitey. If this RfA fails without even making the discretionary range then I fear the message will be the opposite of what Carcharoth suggests to other long-term editors who fear that an RfA will become a forum to criticise their shortcomings and largely disregard their years of useful contributions. [[User:EdChem|EdChem]] ([[User talk:EdChem|talk]]) 13:34, 8 April 2019 (UTC)
#Support adminning RexxS, because I think it would be a net benefit for the encyclopedia. He's explained where he intends to use the tools and has stated that he wouldn't use them recklessly in unfamiliar areas. Tone and the need to be right might be an issue, but I don't believe Rexx will abuse the tools nor assert himself in a domineering manner just because he's carrying a badge now. ---[[User:Sluzzelin|Sluzzelin]] [[User talk:Sluzzelin|<small>talk</small>]] 13:43, 8 April 2019 (UTC)
#'''Support''' because it's a few extra buttons and
=====Oppose=====
| |||