Revision as of 05:03, 10 April 2019 edit Jim.henderson (talk \| contribs) Autopatrolled, Event coordinators, Extended confirmed users, IP block exemptions, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers 73,293 edits →Lead and distributed element model: Mea culpa ← Previous edit		Revision as of 10:06, 10 April 2019 edit undo Spinningspark (talk \| contribs) 89,216 edits →Lead and distributed element model Next edit →
Line 37: :Thanks. I am the guilty party and can stand by my intention, but must admit that my implementation is indeed poor, in particular my placing the matter too early in the article. Maybe eventually I can work out a better way; maybe not, but meanwhile feel free. [[User:Jim.henderson\|Jim.henderson]] ([[User talk:Jim.henderson\|talk]]) 05:02, 10 April 2019 (UTC) ::Ok, I've rolled back the first paragraph to before the introduction of the link. It was first introduced by [[user:Sam-2727]], but I don't like that version either. It said {{xt\|conventional components are difficult (or impossible) to implement if the distributed element model is not used.}} This is not correct for the same reasons. The model does not implement components, and it does not model conventional components – it models distributed components. [[User:Spinningspark\|<b style="background:#FAFAD2;color:#C08000">Spinning</b>]][[User talk:Spinningspark\|<b style="color:#4840A0">Spark</b>]] 10:05, 10 April 2019 (UTC)

Talk:Distributed-element circuit: Difference between revisions