Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2019 April 8: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
Marcocapelle (talk | contribs) Tags: Mobile edit Mobile app edit Android app edit |
|||
Line 211:
<small>Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, [[User:DannyS712|DannyS712]] ([[User talk:DannyS712|talk]]) 02:07, 8 April 2019 (UTC)</small><!-- from Template:Relist --></div><!-- Please add new comments below this line -->
*[[user:Furius|Furius]], I'm happy to go along with your selective approach (provided other parents are considered), but re Nijmegen did you notice what Marcocapelle wrote above, dated 14 January? – [[User:Fayenatic london|Fayenatic]] [[User talk:Fayenatic london|'''<span style="color: #FF0000;">L</span>'''ondon]] 13:54, 10 April 2019 (UTC)
:* I did see it, yes. I don't read Dutch as Marcocapelle does, but I can see that the Dutch articles are generally pretty poor. However, the German versions of the same are often substantially better sourced so I don't think that the presumption of non-notability holds. I don't think that [[:de:Nieuwe Hezelpoort]], [[:nl:De Oversteek (brug)]], [[:de:Snelbinder]] could really be challenged if translated (with the two articles already in the category, that would bring us up to 5 articles, cf. [[:Category:Bridges in Sheffield]]). The fact that the other articles aren't so good doesn't make it obvious to me that there's no possbility of notability. In other words, I'm more optimistic about the potential for growth. [[User:Furius|Furius]] ([[User talk:Furius|talk]]) 23:30, 10 April 2019 (UTC)
==== Category:Pinball Hall of Fame: The Williams Collection ====
| |||