Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2019 April 8: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
→Bridges by city: Thanks; also ping nominator user:Marcocapelle |
Rathfelder (talk | contribs) |
||
Line 66:
::::Oh, I should have proposed upmerger, not deletion, shouldn't I? [[User:Bondegezou|Bondegezou]] ([[User talk:Bondegezou|talk]]) 15:54, 9 April 2019 (UTC)
*'''Keep''' - if Fabian Society Executive Committee is not mentioned in an article then the category should be removed. (Editors should not be 'chopping' school alumni categories from articles (assuming the school is mentioned and preferably sourced). I think (in practice) we categorize by defining characteristics and also a list of factoids - year of birth, death, place person is from, school, university + a few others.) [[User:Oculi|Oculi]] ([[User talk:Oculi|talk]]) 11:09, 10 April 2019 (UTC)
*'''Keep''' There are plenty of categories which are defining for some of the members, but not for others. Sometimes they reveal interesting connections which have not been generally noticed. I think we should keep them if they are significant for a reasonable number. I dont see much harm done if that means some people appear in categories which, as far as they are concerned, are not really defining. [[User:Rathfelder|Rathfelder]] ([[User talk:Rathfelder|talk]]) 21:36, 11 April 2019 (UTC)
==== Category:Springs (mechanical) ====
| |||