Content deleted Content added
Kronhjorten (talk | contribs) m →Requested move 16 April 2019: forgot to add signature to previous post |
fix typo in Boazhsan comment |
||
Line 14:
To add weight to the above move request, it should be noted that the workshop for the field, which previously went by the nomenclature FFAG<year> is, since last year, FFA<year> ([http://www.rri.kyoto-u.ac.jp/beam_physics_lab/ffag18/ FFAG18 website]).--[[User:Davidkelliher|Davidkelliher]] ([[User talk:Davidkelliher|talk]]) 08:57, 16 April 2019 (UTC)
The change in acronym has been taken up by the recent ICFA Beam Dynamics newsletter, #76, [http://www.icfa-bd.org/Newsletter76.pdf]. On page 10, they state: "Finally, the change of acronym to FFA (referring to Fixed-Field alternating gradient
* '''Oppose''' . I absolutely agree that the page should be moved to reflect the new acronym (FFA), but I don't think that "Fixed Field Accelerator" is the right destination page. As such I support ''a move'' but not ''this move''. The sources listed above all seem to agree that they are called [[Fixed Field alternating gradient accelerator]][s], so perhaps that should be the new page name, with FFA listed as the correct acronym on the page. Another option would be renaming the page to [[FFA (particle accelerator)]], or similar. In fact a redirect from one of those to the other would probably make sense too. It doesn't seem like they are anywhere referred to as simply "Fixed Field Accelerators" (although if they are, in sources I haven't seen, I'd reverse my position and support this move). [[User:Kronhjorten|Kronhjorten]] ([[User talk:Kronhjorten|talk]]) 11:15, 18 April 2019 (UTC)
|