Talk:Comparison of HTML editors: Difference between revisions

Revision as of 05:25, 4 April 2018

Revision as of 09:50, 24 April 2019

Line 55:

:::Seems to be '''POV''' to have a thing for excluding [[GNU emacs]]. This was in the version of this article merely half a year ago. ''The title of this current article does not delineate or exclude certain kinds of HTML editors. Whether it is or isn't WYSIWYG is immaterial.[[User:Dogru144|Dogru144]] ([[User talk:Dogru144|talk]]) 02:00, 9 April 2010 (UTC)

If you want to include general text editor that have extensions to support html editing, put it in a separate section with at least a few others -- notepad++ I think has html extensions, as well as vim, my mind goes blank here...but I really would rather see ones who's main focus is on web development (HTML,CSS, JS, etc) in their own collection and have text editors with support in another. But latex has a gui...can't remember the name, but it looks like it would have an html output and would be more likely to have WYSIWYG features than vim, emacs, etc. I'm not sure if it belongs here, and I wouldn't know where to put it. Anyway -- I got led here searching for editor like NVU and komposer and the ilk. I certainly don't see gnu or vim in the same category.

[[User:Athenae|Astara Athenea]] ([[User talk:Athenae|talk]]) 09:50, 24 April 2019 (UTC)

== Preview Pane ==