Talk:Fixed-field alternating gradient accelerator: Difference between revisions

Revision as of 13:35, 25 April 2019

Revision as of 20:57, 25 April 2019

Line 23:

* I just want to mention that I agree with the move that was made -- thanks Boazhsan. Would it be worth mentioning that they were formerly known as FFAGs in the lead section? This may be useful to people looking to learn more, especially from older sources. Also in the spirit of consistency, having moved this page we should probably try to replace FFAG -> FFA in other places on Wikipedia (Search FFAG or FFAGA and there are lots of results). I have done a few, but would appreciate help. --[[User:Kronhjorten|Kronhjorten]] ([[User talk:Kronhjorten|talk]]) 13:34, 25 April 2019 (UTC)

<div class="boilerplate" style="background-color: #efe; margin: 2em 0 0 0; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px dotted #aaa;"><!-- Template:RM top -->

* Thanks Kronhjorten. I was confused on how to remove the move statement at the top of the article. I removed it, but a bot keeps reinstating it. Yes, I agree that some kind of note should be made that people in the field have decided to change acronyms. I've also been continuing with changing the acronym where I see its appropriate. Its true that a lot of the literature still uses FFAG, so we can't change names of pre-existing publications.[[User:Boazhsan|Boazhsan]] ([[User talk:Boazhsan|talk]]) 20:57, 25 April 2019 (UTC)

The result of the move request was: moved to Fixed-Field alternating gradient accelerator [[User:Boazhsan|Boazhsan]] ([[User talk:Boazhsan|talk]]) 20:51, 24 April 2019 (UTC)