Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Rama/Evidence: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
→Evidence presented by Sitush: clarify |
|||
Line 146:
*{{tq|These nominations were mared with divisive arguments proved to be untrue}}
*:Your evaluation is what's proved to be untrue. As to the diff provided over there, [[User_talk:David_Eppstein#Bogus_yourself|discussions have continued over Eppstein's t/p]] in the regard). There is not any one objective truth in these spheres.
*{{tq|Likewise, it is easy to find stubs about pornographic actresses. The overall effect of confining women to stereotypical gender roles needs not be underlined.}}
*:The community has [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?oldid=889368900#Re3js3W69CrMinNGtLdWyYrnnKzHR26vu4BIO already deprecated] PORNBIO as a SNG and massive influx of deletion nominations have been since [[Special:Diff/895996848|predicted]].
*:Troutman opted to delete Phelps whilst !voting for the deprecation of the SNG. DGG asked for heightened restriction of PORNBIO whilst opting for deletion of Phelps and later, even restored it. Two/three others opted for deleting Phelps and keeping the SNG. In short, there's not much of a co-relation.
*::There's no hidden agenda of the community and the final outcome certainly proves that your inference from a weird comparison is awfully wrong.
*{{tq|The artificial nature of the events unfolding on the English-speaking Wikipedia is also apparent when contrasted with other Wikimedia projects.}}
*:The last time I checked, the sister projects (and even other language versions) were editorially independent. Why shall you compare apples and oranges?
Rama is cherry-picking favorable opinions and presenting them in a light of being a trademarked truth whilst (again) failing to recognize the (lack of) consensus notwithstanding some blatant mistruths. He's once again blaming the overall circumstances to be targeted and intentionally misogynistic.
In short, it's the 2010 saga and IDHT behaviour. He did not understand consensus, do not understand consensus and will not understand consensus. [[User:Winged Blades of Godric|<span style="color: red">∯</span><span style="font-family:Verdana"><b style="color:#070">WBG</b></span>]][[User talk:Winged Blades of Godric|<sup><span style="color:#00F">converse</span></sup>]] 17:50, 9 May 2019 (UTC)
|