Talk:Pre- and post-test probability: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added
Disadvantage of Likelihood ratios: avoided move to bottom
m Replacing deprecated latex syntax mw:Extension:Math/Roadmap
Line 12:
 
But that can be read directly off of the chart given in the article, in one calculation, by the definition of conditional probability:
:<math> P( Cancer = True | Test = True) = \frac{ P(Cancer = True \andland Test = True)}{P(Test=True)} = \frac{2}{2+8} = 0.10</math>
 
That seems '''way''' easier than the complicated multi-step process described in the example. So why would you ever do it that way?