Intelligent design and science: Difference between revisions

Revision as of 02:06, 12 May 2019

Revision as of 02:07, 12 May 2019

Line 933:

|url=http://www.actionbioscience.org/evolution/nhmag.html

|accessdate=2007-07-18

|monthdate=April 2002

|year=2002

|work=[[Natural History (magazine)|Natural History]]

}}</ref> How this appeal is made and what this implies as to the definition of intelligence are topics left largely unaddressed. [[Seth Shostak]], a researcher with the [[SETI Institute]], disputed Dembski's comparison of SETI and intelligent design, saying that intelligent design advocates base their inference of design on complexity—the argument being that some biological systems are too complex to have been made by natural processes—while SETI researchers are looking primarily for [[Artificial creation|artificial]]ity.<ref>

Line 943 ⟶ 942:

|url=http://www.space.com/searchforlife/seti_intelligentdesign_051201.html

|accessdate=2007-07-18

|monthdate=December 2005

|year=2005

|publisher=[[Space.com]]

|quote=In fact, the signals actually sought by today's SETI searches are not complex, as the ID advocates assume. [...] If SETI were to announce that we're not alone because it had detected a signal, it would be on the basis of artificiality

Line 964 ⟶ 962:

|last=Edis

|first=Taner

|yeardate=March–April 2001

|month=March–April

|work=Skeptical Inquirer

|archiveurl=https://web.archive.org/web/20011018142820/http://www.csicop.org/si/2001-03/intelligent-design.html