Revision as of 02:09, 12 May 2019 edit GoingBatty (talk \| contribs) Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, IP block exemptions, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers 663,042 edits →"Teach the Controversy": fixed reference ← Previous edit		Revision as of 02:10, 12 May 2019 edit undo GoingBatty (talk \| contribs) Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, IP block exemptions, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers 663,042 edits →Theistic science: fixed references Next edit →
Line 208: \|journal=Philo \|volume=3 \|~~year~~date=Fall–Winter 2000 ~~\|month=Fall–Winter~~ \|issue=2 \|pages=7–29 Line 238 ⟶ 237: \|last=Vuletic \|first=Mark I. \|~~year~~date=February 1997 ~~\|month=February~~ \|work=Naturalism, Theism and the Scientific Enterprise: An Interdisciplinary Conference \|publisher=University of Texas, Austin Line 294 ⟶ 292: \|editor2-last=Hearn \|editor2-first=Virginia \|~~month~~date=March 1992 ~~\|year=1992~~ \|work=Darwinism: Scientific Inference or Philosophical Preference? (Symposium) \|publisher=The Foundation for Thought and Ethics, Dallas Christian Leadership, and the C. S. Lewis Fellowship Line 318 ⟶ 315: \|last=Sober \|first=Elliott \|~~year~~date=March 2007 ~~\|month=March~~ \|title=What is wrong with intelligent design? \|journal=Quarterly Review of Biology

Intelligent design and science: Difference between revisions