Revision as of 00:24, 13 May 2019 edit Syndiate (talk \| contribs) Extended confirmed users 872 edits No edit summary ← Previous edit		Revision as of 10:07, 14 May 2019 edit undo Daask (talk \| contribs) Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Page movers, New page reviewers, Pending changes reviewers 33,616 edits Delete Next edit →
Line 10: * '''Delete'''. I don't doubt that an article at this title could be written – [https://books.google.co.uk/books?id=_QPIuR9cRoYC&pg=PA587 this] came top of the search results. I don't think the nom is right about there being no such thing, there are plenty of books on diesel engine maintenance and troubleshooting. But the nom is right about the poor quality of this article. Plus [[WP:DENY]] applies in this case. [[User:Spinningspark\|<b style="background:#FAFAD2;color:#C08000">Spinning</b>]][[User talk:Spinningspark\|<b style="color:#4840A0">Spark</b>]] 22:40, 12 May 2019 (UTC) * '''Delete''' It does not meet [[WP:GNG]]. It is not notable to the point where it can be its own article. [[User:SyndicaterUI78\|Syndicater]] ([[User talk:SyndicaterUI78\|talk]]) 00:24, 13 May 2019 (UTC) * '''Delete'''. I'm with {{noping\|Spinningspark}} that this topic ''is'' notable and ''could'' be written, but agree that this is a case for [[WP:DENY]]. It would need a total rewrite, so [[WP:TNT]] also applies. [[User:Daask\|Daask]] ([[User talk:Daask\|talk]]) 10:06, 14 May 2019 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Diesel engine problems: Difference between revisions