Redshift quantization: Difference between revisions

Revision as of 17:50, 24 May 2019

Revision as of 20:34, 24 May 2019

Line 14:

|doi=10.1007/BF02715046}}</ref>

Redshift quantization is a fringecontroversial topic withconsidered noto supportbe fromin mainstreamthe astronomersfringes inof recentmodern timesastronomy. AlthoughThough therethe areidea ais handfulgenerally ofdiscounted published articles inby the last decade inlarge supportmajority of quantizationastronomers, thosepeer-reviewed viewspublications areand rejecteddiscourse byon the resttopic ofstill continue to the fieldpresent day.<ref>{{cite book |last1= Babu |first= G. Jogesh |last2=Feigelson |first2= Eric D. |year= 1996 |title= Astrostatistics |page= 183 |isbn= 978-0412983917}}</ref>.

==Original investigation by William G. Tifft==

Line 71:

Schneider ''et al.'' (2007) and Richards ''et al.'' (2006) report that the periodicity reported by Bell and McDiarmid disappears after correcting for selection effects.<ref>{{cite journal | last1 = Schneider | display-authors =etal | date=2007| title = The Sloan Digital Sky Survey Quasar Catalog. IV. Fifth Data Release| bibcode=2007AJ....134..102S | journal = The Astronomical Journal | volume = 134 | issue = 1| pages = 102–117 |doi = 10.1086/518474 |arxiv = 0704.0806 }}</ref><ref>{{cite journal | last1 = Richards | first1 = G. T. | display-authors =etal | date=2006| title = The Sloan Digital Sky Survey Quasar Survey: Quasar Luminosity Function from Data Release 3| journal = The Astronomical Journal | volume = 131 | issue = 6 | pages = 2766–2787 |doi = 10.1086/503559 |arxiv = astro-ph/0601434 | bibcode=2006AJ....131.2766R}}</ref> However, Bell and Comeau (2010) have since argued that this correction removes nearly half of the sample and does not explain how selection effects give rise to redshift peaks. The same study also concludes that a "filter gap footprint" renders it impossible to verify or falsify the presence of a true redshift peak at Δ''z'' = 0.60.<ref>{{cite journal | last1 = Bell| first1 = M. B. | last2 = Comeau | first2 = S. P. | date=2010| title = Selection Effects in the SDSS Quasar Sample: The Filter Gap Footprint| journal = Astrophys Space Sci | volume = 326 | issue = 1| pages = 11–17 |doi = 10.1007/s10509-009-0232-2 |arxiv = 0911.5700 |bibcode = 2010Ap&SS.326...11B }}</ref>

A 2006 review by Bajan ''et al.'' discovered weak effects of redshift periodization in data from the [[Local Group]] of galaxies and the [[Hercules Supercluster]]. They conclude that "galaxy redshift periodization is an effect which can really exist", thoughbut that the evidence is not well established pending study of larger databases.<ref>{{cite journal |bibcode=2007PPNL....4....5B|arxiv=astro-ph/0606294 | title=On the Investigations of Galaxy Redshift Periodicity | journal=Physics of Particles and Nuclei Letters |date=2007 |volume=4 |issue=1 |pages=5–10 |first1=K. |last1=Bajan |first2=P. |last2=Flin |first3=W. |last3=Godlowski |first4=V. N. |last4=Pervushin |doi=10.1134/s1547477107010025}}</ref>

A 2007 [[absorption spectroscopy|absorption spectroscopic]] analysis of quasars by Ryabinkov ''et al.'' observed a pattern of statistically significant alternating peaks and dips in the redshift range Δ''z'' = 0.0 − 3.7, though they noted no statistical correlation between their findings and Karlsson's formula.<ref>{{cite journal | last1 = Ryabinkov| first1 = A. I. | last2 = Kaminker| first2 = A. D. | last3 = Varshalovich| first3 = D. A. | date=2007| title = The redshift distribution of absorption-line systems in QSO spectra| journal = Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. | volume = 376| issue = 4 | pages = 1838–18481 | doi=10.1111/j.1365-2966.2007.11567.x | bibcode=2007MNRAS.376.1838R|arxiv = astro-ph/0703277 }}</ref>