Revision as of 23:40, 11 April 2019 edit Argenis (talk \| contribs) 9 edits →Code Names ← Previous edit		Revision as of 23:10, 2 June 2019 edit undo Dancingsnails (talk \| contribs) 29 edits No edit summary Next edit →
Line 22: I updated the codenames today with the right ones :) Hekaton indeed wasn't the codename for SQL2014. That's a myth. Internally that release was always known as SQL14. SQL15 became SQL16, and then Helsinki hit the radar. However unlike Hekaton, Helsinki referred to the overall release, not just SQL Server on Linux. [[User:Argenis\|Argenis]] ([[User talk:Argenis\|talk]]) 16:28, 11 April 2019 (PST) == Genesis == Having worked at Ashton Tate in the SQL group at that time, my memory is that the only people at Ashton Tate that had anything to do with SQL Server was the marketing department - in an aborted Ashton Tate branding by Microsoft of SQL Server on OS2. We had nothing to do with it. It was all Sybase. I can't get to the reference listed for this - Backup & Recovery: Inexpensive Backup Solutions for Open Systems - but I can't see why it would be a good reference for this. [[User:Dancingsnails\|Dancingsnails]] ([[User talk:Dancingsnails\|talk]]) 23:10, 2 June 2019 (UTC)

Talk:History of Microsoft SQL Server: Difference between revisions