Content deleted Content added
Mike Cline (talk | contribs) added oldAfDfull tag |
→Issues with the two new sections.: new section |
||
Line 20:
===Edits===
It's worthwhile to keep, it just needs to be explained at a layman's level and made encyclopedic. [[User:kgrr|<font style="background: lightblue"> kgrr</font>]] [[User talk:kgrr|<sup><b>talk</b></sup>]] 16:58, 22 March 2010 (UTC)
== Issues with the two new sections. ==
Two new sections have been recently introduced, which have many issues. Some of them are related to the style, but some others break or seem break basic policies of Wikipedia. therefore, I'll revert these additions. Here are the main issues.
* [[WP:NOTESSAY]]: The whole section is written as an essay. A witness of this is the massive use of [[WP:PEACOCK]] terms, including blatant exaggerations ("The Algorithm has influenced billions of computers and internet users across globe in various domains").
* [[WP:SYNTHESIS]]: The whole section is unsourced original synthesis. The four sources that are provided are primary sources (see [[WP:PRIMARY]]) for applications of Brooks–Iyengar algorithm, not for the synthesis.
* [[WP:Reliable sources]]: These four primary sources are not reliable in the sense of Wikipedia: One is a software repository, one is a unpublished report, one is a software presentation at a conference, and one is published in a journal of regional audience (South America). There is nothing supporting that they deserve to be mentioned in an encyclopedia.
* [[WP:NPOV]]: The section as if there were no other algorithm for the same problem, or as if these algorithms are variants of the Brooks–Iyengar algorithm. This is unbelievable in such an important area.
* Suspected [[WP:COPYVIO]]: The text seems to be copied-pasted from a text written elsewhere. A witness of this is the use of "Figure [3]" and "[17]" in a context where these numbers are nonsensical.
* Suspected [[WP:COI]]: The use of first names only for denoting some contributors "Pablo and Gabriel" suggests a strong connection with the editor. Also, the editor is a [[WP:SPA]].
As each of these issues is a valid reason for a revert, I'll revert these sections. [[User:D.Lazard|D.Lazard]] ([[User talk:D.Lazard|talk]]) 14:00, 4 June 2019 (UTC)
|