Content deleted Content added
→Issues with the two new sections.: Better answer needed |
→Issues with the two new sections.: replying |
||
Line 46:
::The links at the beginning of each issues are links to Wikipedia policies. So, answering needs to show that these policies are respected, not, as {{u|Lateshkj}} did, to explain what the editor think that the policies should be. In particular, using material coming to a submitted article is a copyvio that is strictly forbidden by Wikipedia. This suffices to remove the added content, and I'll do that.
::By the way, Wikipedia rules for solving an editorial conflict are summarized in [[WP:BRD]]. In summary, when you are reverted, '''you must not revert the revert''', which is [[WP:edit warring]]. Instead you must discuss on the talk page and wait for a consensus (see [[WP: Consensus]]) for including or rejecting you edit. Because of the number of issues, I doubt that you can get a consensus for accepting your edit. [[User:D.Lazard|D.Lazard]] ([[User talk:D.Lazard|talk]]) 16:11, 6 June 2019 (UTC)
:{{u|Lateshkj}}, a journal that is still "under review" is likely not published, and does not count as a reliable source. If something is "on its way", do not add it to Wikipedia yet. For text donations, please see [[Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials]].
:You do not seem to have addressed the "conflict of interest" concern in your response, despite linking to the guideline. Your response to the "synthesis" point appears to be contradictory ("Yes, It is true"?).
:Focusing on "your algorithm" may cause the article to have an [[WP:UNDUE|undue weight]] towards the algorithm. [[User:ToBeFree|~ ToBeFree]] ([[User talk:ToBeFree|talk]]) 16:47, 6 June 2019 (UTC)
| |||