Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ring (programming language): Difference between revisions

Revision as of 16:25, 10 June 2019

Revision as of 17:31, 10 June 2019

Line 11:

*'''Delete''' No significant coverage from third-party sources and also no indication of meeting NSOFT. --<span style="text-shadow:0 1px 5px #99FFFF">[[User:94rain|<font color="#6495ED">94rain</font>]] [[User_talk:94rain|^{<font color="gold">'''Talk'''</font>}]] </span> 11:07, 10 June 2019 (UTC)

*'''Delete''' For the sake of [[Straw_man#Steelmanning|steelmanning]], I'll point out that [https://www.youm7.com/story/2016/1/11/%D9%81%D9%89-25-%D9%8A%D9%86%D8%A7%D9%8A%D8%B1-%D8%A7%D9%84%D9%85%D9%82%D8%A8%D9%84-%D9%84%D8%BA%D8%A9-%D8%A8%D8%B1%D9%85%D8%AC%D8%A9-%D8%AC%D8%AF%D9%8A%D8%AF%D8%A9-%D8%A8%D9%85%D9%88%D8%A7%D8%B5%D9%81%D8%A7%D8%AA-%D8%B9%D8%A7%D9%84%D9%85%D9%8A%D8%A9-%D9%85%D9%86/2532713#.Vxg2-tQrLIU this article] in [[Youm7]] could be argued to constitute [[WP:SIGCOV]]. But I'm still inclined to delete for a few reasons: a) [[WP:GNG]] says that "multiple sources are generally expected", and I can't find any other reliable secondary sources covering this topic b) I don't think this Youm7 article/interview is particularly reliable for establishing the notability of the programming language itself. It's as much about the interviewee (Fayed) as the language. And if this were a notable programming language, I would expect coverage in RS that cover technology/computer science. c) The interview (in Jan 2016) talks about the language as something newly announced which is about to be published. So [[WP:SUSTAINED]] and [[WP:CRYSTALBALL]] come into play. [[User:Colin M|Colin M]] ([[User talk:Colin M|talk]]) 15:49, 10 June 2019 (UTC)

*'''Keep''' [https://www.youm7.com/story/2016/1/11/%D9%81%D9%89-25-%D9%8A%D9%86%D8%A7%D9%8A%D8%B1-%D8%A7%D9%84%D9%85%D9%82%D8%A8%D9%84-%D9%84%D8%BA%D8%A9-%D8%A8%D8%B1%D9%85%D8%AC%D8%A9-%D8%AC%D8%AF%D9%8A%D8%AF%D8%A9-%D8%A8%D9%85%D9%88%D8%A7%D8%B5%D9%81%D8%A7%D8%AA-%D8%B9%D8%A7%D9%84%D9%85%D9%8A%D8%A9-%D9%85%D9%86/2532713#.Vxg2-tQrLIU 1] [https://www.youm7.com/story/2016/11/23/%D8%A8%D8%AF%D8%A1-%D8%AA%D8%B7%D9%88%D9%8A%D8%B1-%D8%A7%D9%84%D8%AC%D9%8A%D9%84-%D8%A7%D9%84%D8%AC%D8%AF%D9%8A%D8%AF-%D9%85%D9%86-%D8%AA%D9%82%D9%86%D9%8A%D8%A9-%D8%A7%D9%84%D8%A8%D8%B1%D9%85%D8%AC%D8%A9-%D8%A8%D8%AF%D9%88%D9%86-%D9%83%D9%88%D8%AF/2979508 2] [https://store.steampowered.com/app/939200/Gold_Magic_800/ 3] [https://www.codeproject.com/Tips/1222859/Different-styles-for-writing-Hello-World-program-i 4] [https://www.codeproject.com/Articles/1096942/Squares-Puzzle-using-RingAllegro 5] [https://www.ciklum.com/blog/new-programming-languages-a-hype-or-reality/ 56] [https://medium.com/@cryptovision/blockchain-app-development-outlook-will-we-all-write-apps-in-the-future-fe5704247b4e 67] printed journals, reviewed articles and usage by some companies (enough to establish notability and a lot of references could be added). Also listed in top 100 programming languages by [https://www.tiobe.com/tiobe-index/ TIOBE Index] and it was in [https://glinksolutions.vn/2018/06/28/evolution-ring-programming-language/ top 50 in 2018]. Yes popularity is not notability but both of them is good indicator. [[User:Charmk|Charmk]] ([[User talk:Charmk|talk]]) 16:25, 10 June 2019 (UTC)