Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ring (programming language): Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
Line 20:
******I doubt Matz even so much as looked at it either; "oh look, someone made a programming language based on my own programming language; what a great way to promote my own programming language by merely posting a link, with nothing else to say for it, while advertising the influential status of my own programming language". If he had anything positive to say, then he would have included it; if you don't have anything nice to say, then don't say anything at all. His favourite languages are [https://www.ruby-lang.org/en/about/ Perl, Smalltalk, Eiffel, Ada, and Lisp]. -- [[User:Shyam Has Your Anomaly Mitigated|Shyam Has Your Anomaly Mitigated]] ([[User talk:Shyam Has Your Anomaly Mitigated|talk]]) 04:41, 11 June 2019 (UTC)
*******Any source including the [http://ring-lang.sourceforge.net/team.html team] is [[WP:PS]]. -- [[User:Shyam Has Your Anomaly Mitigated|Shyam Has Your Anomaly Mitigated]] ([[User talk:Shyam Has Your Anomaly Mitigated|talk]]) 04:53, 11 June 2019 (UTC)
******** In the beginning, I listed enough resources that establish notability through reliable and secondary resources (printed journals, reviewed articles and companies using the language). You are talking about another topics (popularity & developer feedback). for popularity I listed many resources about the language like thousands of movies and blogs by many authors, and for developers feedback. You can add this section (Criticism) to the article using neutral point of view. [[User:Charmk|Charmk]] ([[User talk:Charmk|talk]]) 10:53, 11 June 2019 (UTC)
| |||