Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ring (programming language): Difference between revisions

Revision as of 15:55, 11 June 2019

Revision as of 16:10, 11 June 2019

Line 24:

*** These are enough [https://www.youm7.com/story/2016/11/23/%D8%A8%D8%AF%D8%A1-%D8%AA%D8%B7%D9%88%D9%8A%D8%B1-%D8%A7%D9%84%D8%AC%D9%8A%D9%84-%D8%A7%D9%84%D8%AC%D8%AF%D9%8A%D8%AF-%D9%85%D9%86-%D8%AA%D9%82%D9%86%D9%8A%D8%A9-%D8%A7%D9%84%D8%A8%D8%B1%D9%85%D8%AC%D8%A9-%D8%A8%D8%AF%D9%88%D9%86-%D9%83%D9%88%D8%AF/2979508 1] [https://store.steampowered.com/app/939200/Gold_Magic_800/ 2] [https://www.codeproject.com/Tips/1222859/Different-styles-for-writing-Hello-World-program-i 3] [https://www.ciklum.com/blog/new-programming-languages-a-hype-or-reality/ 4] and the authors are not listed in Ring Team, Also listing [http://ring-lang.net 180 members in Ring Team] doesn't change their secondary resources about the language to primary resources, because it's clear that [http://ring-lang.net/doc/index.html Ring 1.0 is developed and published by Fayed alone in 2016] then their names are added after they provided what we can consider as secondary resources (articles, applications, etc) as we notice from the Role column in [http://ring-lang.net/team.html Ring Team] and [https://github.com/ring-lang/ring/graphs/contributors GitHub contributors]. so other references [https://www.youm7.com/story/2016/1/11/%D9%81%D9%89-25-%D9%8A%D9%86%D8%A7%D9%8A%D8%B1-%D8%A7%D9%84%D9%85%D9%82%D8%A8%D9%84-%D9%84%D8%BA%D8%A9-%D8%A8%D8%B1%D9%85%D8%AC%D8%A9-%D8%AC%D8%AF%D9%8A%D8%AF%D8%A9-%D8%A8%D9%85%D9%88%D8%A7%D8%B5%D9%81%D8%A7%D8%AA-%D8%B9%D8%A7%D9%84%D9%85%D9%8A%D8%A9-%D9%85%D9%86/2532713#.Vxg2-tQrLIU 1] [https://www.codeproject.com/Articles/1096942/Squares-Puzzle-using-RingAllegro 2] are secondary references too, all of this establish notability while being listed in top 100 programming languages by [https://www.tiobe.com/tiobe-index/ TIOBE Index] and it was in [https://glinksolutions.vn/2018/06/28/evolution-ring-programming-language/ top 50 in 2018] indicates popularity which is good too. [[User:Charmk|Charmk]] ([[User talk:Charmk|talk]]) 15:16, 11 June 2019 (UTC)

****So there's only 180 total users of the language of all time? And some unknown quantity of them are no longer producing relevant content? But remain listed as such? So the current total users of the language is less than 180? -- [[User:Shyam Has Your Anomaly Mitigated|Shyam Has Your Anomaly Mitigated]] ([[User talk:Shyam Has Your Anomaly Mitigated|talk]]) 15:55, 11 June 2019 (UTC)

***** listing some people providing some content (articles, applications, videos, etc) about a programming language doesn't mean that they are the only users! A lot of people use many software without writing about it (if it's good software that works and comes with good documentation). Again you are talking about popularity which is another topic. (Also some secondary sources indicates popularity). [[User:Charmk|Charmk]] ([[User talk:Charmk|talk]]) 16:10, 11 June 2019 (UTC)