Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ring (programming language): Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
Line 26:
***** listing some people providing some content (articles, applications, videos, etc) about a programming language doesn't mean that they are the only users! A lot of people use many software without writing about it (if it's good software that works and comes with good documentation). Again you are talking about popularity which is another topic. (Also some secondary sources indicates popularity). [[User:Charmk|Charmk]] ([[User talk:Charmk|talk]]) 16:10, 11 June 2019 (UTC)
******The only way they even got on TIOBE in the first place was because they had a Wikipedia page! As per the second entry in their [https://www.tiobe.com/tiobe-index/ Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ)]. I think this is your one true reason for voting to keep this around; without it, there is no TIOBE, which negatively influences the marketing of the language. -- [[User:Shyam Has Your Anomaly Mitigated|Shyam Has Your Anomaly Mitigated]] ([[User talk:Shyam Has Your Anomaly Mitigated|talk]]) 16:19, 11 June 2019 (UTC)
*******[https://github.com/search?utf8=%E2%9C%93&q=language%3ARing&type=Repositories&ref=advsearch&l=&l=Ring GitHub] only has <code>159</code> users, and only <code>4÷(32+)</code> repositories have stars; the most of which is <code>2</code>. -- [[User:Shyam Has Your Anomaly Mitigated|Shyam Has Your Anomaly Mitigated]] ([[User talk:Shyam Has Your Anomaly Mitigated|talk]]) 16:37, 11 June 2019 (UTC)
| |||