Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ring (programming language): Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added
Line 35:
*****It is unsatisfiable for the consensus of this discussion. You argue they are not [[WP:PS]], even though they are authored by [http://ring-lang.sourceforge.net/team.html current team members]; where is the history for that team page on [[SourceForge]] to back your claims? The industry usage is unfavourable; usage by Emotiq is condemned by the source (Emotiq [http://web.archive.org/web/20181220205817/https://emotiq.ch/faq.html never] actually used this Ring; it was their own Ring the whole time! This also proves that authors of sources that aren't notable don't even know what they're sourcing about! Since it's probably just a niche fad, and nobody will notice.), and Gold Magic 800 is a [http://ring-lang.sourceforge.net/doc1.10/goldmagic800.html primary source] that is not a notable game ([[Steam (software)#Curation]] says ''As these processes allow developers to publish games on Steam with minimal oversight from Valve, journalists have criticized Valve for lacking curation policies that make it difficult to find quality games among poorly produced games, aka "shovelware".''). There's a low number of verifiable users, and more [[WP:RS]] from Egypt is expected from such brobdingnagian download rates. This language isn't even notably bad! There are far worse languages! And the article doesn't even reflect the truth of the language; nobody even wants to use it unless they're in the team! "Oh look, I can list that on my job applications!!! :D" I mean how many graphic designers does it take to make a programming language look worth using? And what does "Vision Achiever" even mean? Is this a [http://www.churchleadershipresources.com/Sermons/Being_a_Vision_Achiever/Being_a_Vision_Achiever_US.pdf religion], or just a programming language? -- [[User:Shyam Has Your Anomaly Mitigated|Shyam Has Your Anomaly Mitigated]] ([[User talk:Shyam Has Your Anomaly Mitigated|talk]]) 18:57, 11 June 2019 (UTC)
******They went from [http://web.archive.org/web/20160213163706/http://ring-lang.sourceforge.net/team.html 0] graphic designers, to [http://web.archive.org/web/20160425132112/http://ring-lang.sourceforge.net:80/team.html 8] graphic designers; all in the span of 2 months! And the logo never changed after that! -- [[User:Shyam Has Your Anomaly Mitigated|Shyam Has Your Anomaly Mitigated]] ([[User talk:Shyam Has Your Anomaly Mitigated|talk]]) 19:19, 11 June 2019 (UTC)
 
*The newly created ''Popularity'' section shouldn't mention TIOBE, since Wikipedia is a dependency; the Ring marketing team is good at SEO optimisation, but not anything else really. The rest isn't [[WP:NEUTRAL]]! [https://medium.com/@cryptovision/blockchain-app-development-outlook-will-we-all-write-apps-in-the-future-fe5704247b4e Medium] says "Ring itself is an ''unpopular'' language that does not offer much for non-programmers.". [https://www.ciklum.com/blog/new-programming-languages-a-hype-or-reality/ Ciklum] says "many developers perceive Ring as being too similar to other programming languages already in existence; in other words, it ''doesn’t offer anything innovative''.". This language may be [[WP:N]] for being the most ambitious job exploitation (I'm aware of), but the article should reflect the below average quality of the language. -- [[User:Shyam Has Your Anomaly Mitigated|Shyam Has Your Anomaly Mitigated]] ([[User talk:Shyam Has Your Anomaly Mitigated|talk]]) 03:03, 12 June 2019 (UTC)