Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ring (programming language): Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
No edit summary |
|||
Line 37:
****** Thanks, The references are updated, includes two articles published in Youm7 and written by another author (Mones Hawas - Not listed in Ring Team). [[User:Charmk|Charmk]] ([[User talk:Charmk|talk]]) 17:26, 12 June 2019 (UTC)
******They went from [http://web.archive.org/web/20160213163706/http://ring-lang.sourceforge.net/team.html 0] graphic designers, to [http://web.archive.org/web/20160425132112/http://ring-lang.sourceforge.net:80/team.html 8] graphic designers; all in the span of 2 months! And the logo never changed after that! -- [[User:Shyam Has Your Anomaly Mitigated|Shyam Has Your Anomaly Mitigated]] ([[User talk:Shyam Has Your Anomaly Mitigated|talk]]) 19:19, 11 June 2019 (UTC)
******* In GitHub they have [https://github.com/ring-lang/ring/tree/master/graphics this folder]. [[User:Charmk|Charmk]] ([[User talk:Charmk|talk]]) 17:30, 12 June 2019 (UTC)
*The newly created ''Popularity'' section shouldn't mention TIOBE, since Wikipedia is a dependency; the Ring marketing team is good at SEO optimisation, but not anything else really. The rest isn't [[WP:NEUTRAL]]! [https://medium.com/@cryptovision/blockchain-app-development-outlook-will-we-all-write-apps-in-the-future-fe5704247b4e Medium] says "Ring itself is an ''unpopular'' language that does not offer much for non-programmers.". [https://www.ciklum.com/blog/new-programming-languages-a-hype-or-reality/ Ciklum] says "many developers perceive Ring as being too similar to other programming languages already in existence; in other words, it ''doesn’t offer anything innovative''.". This language may be [[WP:N]] for being the most ambitious job exploitation (I'm aware of), but the article should reflect the below average quality of the language. -- [[User:Shyam Has Your Anomaly Mitigated|Shyam Has Your Anomaly Mitigated]] ([[User talk:Shyam Has Your Anomaly Mitigated|talk]]) 03:03, 12 June 2019 (UTC)
| |||