Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ring (programming language): Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added
Ring (programming language): re new Youm7 sources
Line 77:
 
*If this was a [https://arxiv.org/pdf/1703.01192.pdf tree language], it would probably be notable for being the first of its' kind, but tree languages are purely theoretical, and I'm not sure about the (over)ambitious predictions made regarding their future; the first two could be like Turing-completeness (a certain amount of supercritical complexity may be problematic for tree notation), the third one is very challenging (legacy code makes the industry less likely to change languages; changing languages means replacing programmers, and code base, which is expensive), and the last one is confusing (I thought tree languages are high level abstract languages, but they don't go into specifics of levelness, nor abstraction;, and perhaps this is an opportunity to unify all programmers as predicted). -- [[User:Shyam Has Your Anomaly Mitigated|Shyam Has Your Anomaly Mitigated]] ([[User talk:Shyam Has Your Anomaly Mitigated|talk]]) 09:22, 12 June 2019 (UTC)
** Thanks for the information, I think this could related to the new features provided by the language to support declarative programming. [[User:Charmk|Charmk]] ([[User talk:Charmk|talk]]) 21:33, 13 June 2019 (UTC)