Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ring (programming language): Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
No edit summary |
|||
Line 274:
*'''Speedy Keep and improve''' The article is updated to establish notability using printed journals, magazines and reviewed articles. I will not repeat them again. The table in the top list some of these resources. Also, the article topic (Ring and related projects : Supernova and PWCT) are open source project and from [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Notability_(software)#Reliability_and_significance_of_sources] we notice "The way the app is distributed. It is reasonable to allow relatively informal sources for free and open-source software, if significance can be shown.". So we have more options too. [[User:Charmk|Charmk]] ([[User talk:Charmk|talk]]) 01:18, 19 June 2019 (UTC)
**Thank you for your effort in improving this article. But please do not rush to close the discussion, which would hinder the generation of clearer consensus. I've striken my previous vote for deletion, but I still hesitate whether to vote for keep before further identifying those sources and knowing others' opinions. Let's be patient and see how it goes. By the way, please do not cite too many primary sources ( en.wikibooks/rosettacode/GitHub/Quora/reddit/Sourceforge/Steam/Youtube/Wordpress). --<span style="text-shadow:0 1px 5px #99FFFF">[[User:94rain|<font color="#6495ED">94rain</font>]] [[User_talk:94rain|<sup><font color="gold">'''Talk'''</font></sup>]] </span> 01:56, 19 June 2019 (UTC)
*** Thank you very much, I will
**Relisting is not an opportunity to !vote again. If you want to amend your earlier 'keep' recommendation you can edit your comment and [[WP:strikethrough|strikethrough]] the previous text. [[User:Colin M|Colin M]] ([[User talk:Colin M|talk]]) 03:04, 19 June 2019 (UTC)
| |||