Revision as of 15:48, 27 April 2019 edit WereSpielChequers (talk \| contribs) Bureaucrats, Administrators 352,611 edits m →Definition: Typo fixing, replaced: an the → and the Tag: AWB ← Previous edit		Revision as of 15:39, 20 June 2019 edit undo Drdpw (talk \| contribs) Extended confirmed users 48,689 edits m →Strengths and weaknesses of approach: bypassing fredirect Next edit →
Line 22: Some issues highlighted include:<ref name="Baldwin"/> [[~~Capture~~Regulatory ~~(politics)\|Capture~~capture]]: The concern here is that the relationship between regulators and the regulated may lead to the interests of the public being neglected. In this situation it is possible for the relationship to become too close, leading to capture. This may result in the regulator protecting the interests of the regulated. [[Liberal legalism\|Legalism]]: Command and control has been accused of stifling competition and enterprise. It has been posited that this is an inevitable consequence of the inflexible and complicated rules that can be created by the approach. Over-regulation can result, which in turn can lead to ‘over-inclusive’ regulation. *[[Standard-setting]]: Selecting the appropriate standards when implementing a CAC regime is crucial if the regulation is to avoid causing detriment to those that it regulates. This is a challenging obstacle to overcome as the amount of information required can be severe.

Command and control regulation: Difference between revisions