Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ring (programming language): Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
No edit summary |
Randykitty (talk | contribs) Relisting discussion (XFDcloser) |
||
Line 3:
<noinclude>{{AFD help}}</noinclude>
:{{la|Ring (programming language)}} – (<includeonly>[[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ring (programming language)|View AfD]]</includeonly><noinclude>[[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2019 June
:({{Find sources AFD|Ring (programming language)}})
[[WP:N]] from the [[Talk:Ring_(programming_language)#Notability|talk page]], and also [[WP:TOOSOON]]. [[User:Shyam Has Your Anomaly Mitigated|Shyam Has Your Anomaly Mitigated]] ([[User talk:Shyam Has Your Anomaly Mitigated|talk]]) 09:03, 10 June 2019 (UTC)
Line 277:
**Relisting is not an opportunity to !vote again. If you want to amend your earlier 'keep' recommendation you can edit your comment and [[WP:strikethrough|strikethrough]] the previous text. [[User:Colin M|Colin M]] ([[User talk:Colin M|talk]]) 03:04, 19 June 2019 (UTC)
*** Thank you very much [[User:Charmk|Charmk]] ([[User talk:Charmk|talk]]) 03:58, 19 June 2019 (UTC)
<div class="xfd_relist" style="border-top: 1px solid #AAA; border-bottom: 1px solid #AAA; padding: 0px 25px;"><span style="color: #FF6600;">'''{{resize|91%|[[Wikipedia:Deletion process#Relisting discussions|Relisted]] to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.}}'''</span><br />'''Relisting comment:''' This discussion is almost impossible to evaluate due to the huge walls of text. Could those who want to keep this article perhaps just list the ''three best sources'' on which their argument for notability is based? After all, three good ''independent'' references to [[WP:RS|reliable sources]] is all we need.<br />
<small>Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, [[User:Randykitty|Randykitty]] ([[User talk:Randykitty|talk]]) 14:40, 27 June 2019 (UTC)</small><!-- from Template:Relist --><noinclude>[[Category:Relisted AfD debates|Ring (programming language)]]</noinclude></div><!-- Please add new comments below this line -->
|