Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ring (programming language): Difference between revisions

Revision as of 07:11, 3 July 2019

Revision as of 07:52, 3 July 2019

Line 329:

** I understand your feelings, but in Wikipedia we follow guidelines, the topic has received significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject, it is presumed to be suitable for a stand-alone article. Maybe it's the language barriers because some of these resources are written in Arabic.[[User:Charmk|Charmk]] ([[User talk:Charmk|talk]]) 02:15, 3 July 2019 (UTC)

*** The main issue here is, your walls of text don´t demonstrate notability, quite the opposite (ref bombing). If you could select only 3 best sources (not more!!!), so we can review them, that would certainly help. [[User:Pavlor|Pavlor]] ([[User talk:Pavlor|talk]]) 05:05, 3 July 2019 (UTC)

**** Thank you very much, The article topic is about Ring and related projects (Supernova, PWCT). An article about this topic requires more references to cover each section (Ring, Supernova, PWCT). I could pick three good references about PWCT from research papers and printed magazines : [https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1167344.pdf][https://computertotaal.nl/artikelen/apps-software/de-beste-freeware-tips-van-oktober-4/][http://doublesvsoop.sourceforge.net/al_allam_magazine_issue_number_116.pdf#page=26]. and I could pick these good references about Ring : [http://bimarabia.com/download/BIMarabia_Arabic/BIMarabia27.pdf#page=8][https://www.codeproject.com/Articles/1096942/Squares-Puzzle-using-RingAllegro][https://www.youm7.com/story/2016/1/11/%D9%81%D9%89-25-%D9%8A%D9%86%D8%A7%D9%8A%D8%B1-%D8%A7%D9%84%D9%85%D9%82%D8%A8%D9%84-%D9%84%D8%BA%D8%A9-%D8%A8%D8%B1%D9%85%D8%AC%D8%A9-%D8%AC%D8%AF%D9%8A%D8%AF%D8%A9-%D8%A8%D9%85%D9%88%D8%A7%D8%B5%D9%81%D8%A7%D8%AA-%D8%B9%D8%A7%D9%84%D9%85%D9%8A%D8%A9-%D9%85%D9%86/2532713][https://www.codeproject.com/Tips/1222859/Different-styles-for-writing-Hello-World-program-i][https://www.youm7.com/story/2016/11/23/%D8%A8%D8%AF%D8%A1-%D8%AA%D8%B7%D9%88%D9%8A%D8%B1-%D8%A7%D9%84%D8%AC%D9%8A%D9%84-%D8%A7%D9%84%D8%AC%D8%AF%D9%8A%D8%AF-%D9%85%D9%86-%D8%AA%D9%82%D9%86%D9%8A%D8%A9-%D8%A7%D9%84%D8%A8%D8%B1%D9%85%D8%AC%D8%A9-%D8%A8%D8%AF%D9%88%D9%86-%D9%83%D9%88%D8%AF/2979508]. All of these references together demonstrates the notability of the article topic, but please don't ignore the table above which contains more references too. I tried to be positive and updated the article and added the references, I invested a lot of time and I started to fell that I'm triedtired and I think this is enough for me at least for now, In my opinion, Keeping the article is the right decision according to Wikipedia guidelines, but I will let the others decide what is good for this article and for Wikipedia. Thanks [[User:Charmk|Charmk]] ([[User talk:Charmk|talk]]) 06:32, 3 July 2019 (UTC)

***** No. Please select only 3 best sources about Ring. Thanks. [[User:Pavlor|Pavlor]] ([[User talk:Pavlor|talk]]) 07:11, 3 July 2019 (UTC)