Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ring (programming language): Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
Delete! |
|||
Line 336:
********* Your approach certainly is not helping. I will give you one last chance: Select one (ONLY ONE = 1) source about Ring (not anything else) you think is best (eg. magazine with editorial staff, respected publisher, independent on the article subject, broad coverage of the article subject). I will review this source and decide for myself. Note more than one reliable source are required to satisfy GNG, but one really good source is enough for me to reconsider my choice. Your turn. [[User:Pavlor|Pavlor]] ([[User talk:Pavlor|talk]]) 09:05, 3 July 2019 (UTC)
********** Why you are talking to me in this way? I am not an employee under your control!, Also I don't care at all about your opinion which is based on feelings and ignoring references listed above (You don't like to invest your time, and my time is valuable too), I just shared my opinion about this topic, updated the article, listed references, I did what I think is useful for Wikipedia, and this is enough for me. Thanks [[User:Charmk|Charmk]] ([[User talk:Charmk|talk]]) 09:18, 3 July 2019 (UTC)
* '''Delete''' 10 righteous people could save one city, 1 single source could save this article. If there is not at least one good source to discuss, then there is no policy based reason to keep this article. [[User:Pavlor|Pavlor]] ([[User talk:Pavlor|talk]]) 09:36, 3 July 2019 (UTC)
| |||