Revision as of 13:34, 3 July 2019 edit Charmk (talk \| contribs) Extended confirmed users 6,009 edits No edit summary ← Previous edit		Revision as of 14:34, 3 July 2019 edit undo Charmk (talk \| contribs) Extended confirmed users 6,009 edits No edit summary Next edit →
Line 341: * '''Last Comment''' I feel that some people who voted for deleting this article are just ignoring the references that establish notability (This doesn't help Wikipedia), <b>The article topic cover Ring and related projects (Supernova & PWCT), and I listed three good references for PWCT notability like [https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1167344.pdf][https://computertotaal.nl/artikelen/apps-software/de-beste-freeware-tips-van-oktober-4/][http://doublesvsoop.sourceforge.net/al_allam_magazine_issue_number_116.pdf#page=26]</b> and they are ignoring them!, Also they ignore articles published in journal (Youm7) by 4 different authors based on feelings that doesn't make sense! And they ignore articles in printed magazines like [http://bimarabia.com/download/BIMarabia_Arabic/BIMarabia27.pdf#page=8] because they don't know Arabic! Those people, I respect them but I can't help them to see the reality! Thanks to all of them, but I hope that Wikipedia contributors learn to invest some more time in evaluation, and learn to not ignore references that they don't uderstand and learn to vote based on facts not feelings! [[User:Charmk\|Charmk]] ([[User talk:Charmk\|talk]]) 09:48, 3 July 2019 (UTC) The article in question is about Ring, not PWCT. If you wrote an article about PWCT, it would be much easier to demonstrate notability (not that sources you listed are great, but at least Al Allam magazine looks like in depth coverage - assuming there is no connection between author and software developers). Less is more in any AfD, insane refbombing is the best way to dissuade even ultra-inclusionist editors like myself. [[User:Pavlor\|Pavlor]] ([[User talk:Pavlor\|talk]]) 12:56, 3 July 2019 (UTC) * Thanks, I see both of Ring and PWCT are closely related so we have this Wikipedia article for both of them merged together, Ring is developed using PWCT and it's visual source is distributed with PWCT, Also Ring is designed for developing PWCT 2.0. [[http://ring-lang.sourceforge.net/doc1.10/introduction.html#motivation]] [[User:Charmk\|Charmk]] ([[User talk:Charmk\|talk]]) 13:10, 3 July 2019 (UTC) * The first page in the [http://pwct.org PWCT Website] talk about developing the Ring programming language using PWCT, and the first page in the [http://ring-lang.net Ring website] talk about this too, and both of them are designed by Fayed and contributors [http://doublesvsoop.sourceforge.net/pwcthelp/team.htm][http://ring-lang.sourceforge.net/team.html] and Youm7 articles [https://www.youm7.com/story/2016/1/11/%D9%81%D9%89-25-%D9%8A%D9%86%D8%A7%D9%8A%D8%B1-%D8%A7%D9%84%D9%85%D9%82%D8%A8%D9%84-%D9%84%D8%BA%D8%A9-%D8%A8%D8%B1%D9%85%D8%AC%D8%A9-%D8%AC%D8%AF%D9%8A%D8%AF%D8%A9-%D8%A8%D9%85%D9%88%D8%A7%D8%B5%D9%81%D8%A7%D8%AA-%D8%B9%D8%A7%D9%84%D9%85%D9%8A%D8%A9-%D9%85%D9%86/2532713][https://www.youm7.com/story/2016/11/23/%D8%A8%D8%AF%D8%A1-%D8%AA%D8%B7%D9%88%D9%8A%D8%B1-%D8%A7%D9%84%D8%AC%D9%8A%D9%84-%D8%A7%D9%84%D8%AC%D8%AF%D9%8A%D8%AF-%D9%85%D9%86-%D8%AA%D9%82%D9%86%D9%8A%D8%A9-%D8%A7%D9%84%D8%A8%D8%B1%D9%85%D8%AC%D8%A9-%D8%A8%D8%AF%D9%88%D9%86-%D9%83%D9%88%D8%AF/2979508][https://www.youm7.com/story/2018/5/29/%D9%85%D8%B5%D8%B1%D9%89-%D9%8A%D9%81%D9%88%D8%B2-%D9%81%D9%89-%D9%85%D8%B3%D8%A7%D8%A8%D9%82%D8%A9-%D8%A7%D9%84%D8%B3%D9%88%D8%B1%D8%B3-%D9%81%D9%88%D8%B1%D8%AC-%D9%84%D9%84%D9%85%D8%B4%D8%A7%D8%B1%D9%8A%D8%B9-%D9%85%D9%81%D8%AA%D9%88%D8%AD%D8%A9-%D8%A7%D9%84%D9%85%D8%B5%D8%AF%D8%B1/3812107] talk about them together. [[User:Charmk\|Charmk]] ([[User talk:Charmk\|talk]]) 13:34, 3 July 2019 (UTC) * The motivation page in Rin

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ring (programming language): Difference between revisions