Revision as of 14:34, 3 July 2019 edit Charmk (talk \| contribs) Extended confirmed users 6,009 edits No edit summary ← Previous edit		Revision as of 14:34, 3 July 2019 edit undo Colin M (talk \| contribs) Autopatrolled, Administrators 12,442 edits No edit summary Next edit →
Line 339: * '''Delete''' 10 righteous people could save one city, 1 single source could save this article. If there is not at least one good source to discuss, then there is no policy based reason to keep this article. [[User:Pavlor\|Pavlor]] ([[User talk:Pavlor\|talk]]) 09:36, 3 July 2019 (UTC) There are resources listed in the table above, but you are ignoring them because You want to vote without investing time to evaluate resources (which is not recommended), (You ignored 4 articles in Youm7 based on feelings ! NOT FAIR). Also you ignored articles in printed magazine because you don't know Arabic [[User:Charmk\|Charmk]] ([[User talk:Charmk\|talk]]) 09:56, 3 July 2019 (UTC) * The problem with listing 23 sources instead of 3 (as you did in the 'summary' table above), is that if someone spends some time scrutinizing one of those sources and comes back with reasons it's not reliable, you can just say "well there are still 22 other sources!". Editors at AfD are generally not going to have the time/patience to carefully consider more than 2 or 3 sources. [[User:Colin M\|Colin M]] ([[User talk:Colin M\|talk]]) 14:34, 3 July 2019 (UTC) * '''Last Comment''' I feel that some people who voted for deleting this article are just ignoring the references that establish notability (This doesn't help Wikipedia), <b>The article topic cover Ring and related projects (Supernova & PWCT), and I listed three good references for PWCT notability like [https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1167344.pdf][https://computertotaal.nl/artikelen/apps-software/de-beste-freeware-tips-van-oktober-4/][http://doublesvsoop.sourceforge.net/al_allam_magazine_issue_number_116.pdf#page=26]</b> and they are ignoring them!, Also they ignore articles published in journal (Youm7) by 4 different authors based on feelings that doesn't make sense! And they ignore articles in printed magazines like [http://bimarabia.com/download/BIMarabia_Arabic/BIMarabia27.pdf#page=8] because they don't know Arabic! Those people, I respect them but I can't help them to see the reality! Thanks to all of them, but I hope that Wikipedia contributors learn to invest some more time in evaluation, and learn to not ignore references that they don't uderstand and learn to vote based on facts not feelings! [[User:Charmk\|Charmk]] ([[User talk:Charmk\|talk]]) 09:48, 3 July 2019 (UTC) ** The article in question is about Ring, not PWCT. If you wrote an article about PWCT, it would be much easier to demonstrate notability (not that sources you listed are great, but at least Al Allam magazine looks like in depth coverage - assuming there is no connection between author and software developers). Less is more in any AfD, insane refbombing is the best way to dissuade even ultra-inclusionist editors like myself. [[User:Pavlor\|Pavlor]] ([[User talk:Pavlor\|talk]]) 12:56, 3 July 2019 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ring (programming language): Difference between revisions