Content deleted Content added
Chris53516 (talk | contribs) →Citations: added emphasis |
Chris53516 (talk | contribs) →Citations: quotes |
||
Line 16:
::I did not say that it needed to be in APA, that was just an example of a good way to cite sources. I used an example in a sentence above. I ''never'' said that the [[Normal curve equivalent|NCE]] article was in APA style, I said it used '''a''' reference style. The NCE article uses references that links a statement to a source listed at the end of the article. That was my point in using that page as an example. It uses ''another'' way of citing sources. I like and use it because it makes every statement verifiable by linking it to a citation or an online reference. Both APA and this "Wikipedia" style cite sources for every claim. And that's what we need to do in this article to make it better. So, stop removing the template until this is done. – [[User:Chris53516|Chris53516]] <sup>([[User talk:Chris53516|Talk]])</sup> 20:38, 27 November 2006 (UTC)
::Here are some quotes from the above policies: "Editors should provide a reliable source for material that is challenged or likely to be challenged, or it may be removed" ([http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Verifiability&oldid=90359217 Wikipedia:Verifiability]). I have provided the challenge. Also, "Any material that is challenged and for which no source is provided may be removed by any editor" ([http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Citing_sources&oldid=90359944 Wikipedia:Citing sources]). I'd rather not remove dubious content. – [[User:Chris53516|Chris53516]] <sup>([[User talk:Chris53516|Talk]])</sup> 20:50, 27 November 2006 (UTC)
| |||