Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Raptor (programming language): Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
Line 11:
** Sorry? Now not only ''topics'' have to be notable, but so do the publishers of any references? When did that happen? [[User:Andy Dingley|Andy Dingley]] ([[User talk:Andy Dingley|talk]]) 17:33, 6 July 2019 (UTC)
** That's a misapplication of the primary notability criterion. [[User:Uncle G/On notability#The primary notability criterion|The criterion]] is whether there are multiple sources that are in-depth coverage by identifiable people with good reputations for fact checking and accuracy that are independent of the subject. So how, exactly, is a 150-page book, written by {{plainlink|1=https://www.usafa.edu/facultyprofile/?smid=10695|2=Steve Hadfield}} et al., not in-depth coverage of the subject written by credentialled subject-matter experts that (at least according to the WWW site) are not the creators of the tool? Please explain. [[User:Uncle G|Uncle G]] ([[User talk:Uncle G|talk]]) 17:58, 6 July 2019 (UTC)
*** Steve Hadfield works in US Air Force Academy, and RAPTOR is hosted and maintained by US Air Force Academy, this is a primary source, Also the book is distributed using (self publishing tools - no publisher) [[
* '''keep''' Nomination as "just not notable" still doesn't carry much weight, no matter how many articles you AfD. [[User:Andy Dingley|Andy Dingley]] ([[User talk:Andy Dingley|talk]]) 17:33, 6 July 2019 (UTC)
:<small class="delsort-notice">Note: This discussion has been included in the [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Education|list of Education-related deletion discussions]]. [[User:CAPTAIN RAJU|<span style="font-family: Bradley Hand ITC;">'''CAPTAIN RAJU'''</span>]]<sup>[[User_talk:CAPTAIN RAJU|(T)]]</sup> 11:22, 6 July 2019 (UTC)</small>
| |||