Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Raptor (programming language): Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
Andy Dingley (talk | contribs) |
|||
Line 12:
** That's a misapplication of the primary notability criterion. [[User:Uncle G/On notability#The primary notability criterion|The criterion]] is whether there are multiple sources that are in-depth coverage by identifiable people with good reputations for fact checking and accuracy that are independent of the subject. So how, exactly, is a 150-page book, written by {{plainlink|1=https://www.usafa.edu/facultyprofile/?smid=10695|2=Steve Hadfield}} et al., not in-depth coverage of the subject written by credentialled subject-matter experts that (at least according to the WWW site) are not the creators of the tool? Please explain. [[User:Uncle G|Uncle G]] ([[User talk:Uncle G|talk]]) 17:58, 6 July 2019 (UTC)
*** '''Steve Hadfield works in US Air Force Academy, and RAPTOR is hosted and maintained by US Air Force Academy, this is a primary source, Also the book is distributed using (self publishing tools - no publisher)''' [[User:Charmk|Charmk]] ([[User talk:Charmk|talk]]) 20:03, 6 July 2019 (UTC)
:::* Here's a tip for free: If you're arguing with Uncle G; he's right, you're wrong. In the whole of geological time, he's probably got a few goofs stashed away somewhere. But on the whole, if you're ever disagreeing with him, check yourself. [[User:Andy Dingley|Andy Dingley]] ([[User talk:Andy Dingley|talk]]) 20:21, 6 July 2019 (UTC)
* '''keep''' Nomination as "just not notable" still doesn't carry much weight, no matter how many articles you AfD. [[User:Andy Dingley|Andy Dingley]] ([[User talk:Andy Dingley|talk]]) 17:33, 6 July 2019 (UTC)
** Please list references for notability that are not (Primary Source) because these references doesn't exist and this article fail GNG [[User:Charmk|Charmk]] ([[User talk:Charmk|talk]]) 20:05, 6 July 2019 (UTC)
| |||