Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Raptor (programming language): Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
Andy Dingley (talk | contribs) |
|||
Line 14:
:::* Here's a tip for free: If you're arguing with Uncle G; he's right, you're wrong. In the whole of geological time, he's probably got a few goofs stashed away somewhere. But on the whole, if you're ever disagreeing with him, check yourself. [[User:Andy Dingley|Andy Dingley]] ([[User talk:Andy Dingley|talk]]) 20:21, 6 July 2019 (UTC)
:::** I respect all of Wikipedia editors and administrators, and I'm happy to learn new things every day. Yes he is right with respect to (significant coverage in the book) but I added more information that prove that '''This is a Primary Source''' so we can't use it for notability according to my knowledge, if I'm wrong, tell me? [[User:Charmk|Charmk]] ([[User talk:Charmk|talk]]) 20:29, 6 July 2019 (UTC)
:::::* "Respect". Except when you stalk those who disagree with you at an AfD, to find articles they've created and then [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tox (Python testing wrapper)|nominate those too]]. Classy. [[User:Andy Dingley|Andy Dingley]] ([[User talk:Andy Dingley|talk]]) 20:32, 6 July 2019 (UTC)
* '''keep''' Nomination as "just not notable" still doesn't carry much weight, no matter how many articles you AfD. [[User:Andy Dingley|Andy Dingley]] ([[User talk:Andy Dingley|talk]]) 17:33, 6 July 2019 (UTC)
** Please list references for notability that are not (Primary Source) because these references doesn't exist and this article fail GNG [[User:Charmk|Charmk]] ([[User talk:Charmk|talk]]) 20:05, 6 July 2019 (UTC)
| |||