Content deleted Content added
Citation bot (talk | contribs) m Add: pages, pmid. Removed URL that duplicated unique identifier. | You can use this bot yourself. Report bugs here.| Activated by User:Marianne Zimmerman |
|||
Line 8:
The sign problem is one of the major unsolved problems in the physics of many-particle systems, impeding progress in many areas:
* [[Condensed matter physics]] — It prevents the numerical solution of systems with a high density of strongly correlated electrons, such as the [[Hubbard model]].<ref>{{cite journal |doi=10.1103/PhysRevB.41.9301 |pmid=9993272 |bibcode=1990PhRvB..41.9301L |title=Sign problem in the numerical simulation of many-electron systems |journal=Physical Review B |volume=41 |issue=13 |pages=9301–9307 |year=1990 |last1=Loh |first1=E. Y. |last2=Gubernatis |first2=J. E. |last3=Scalettar |first3=R. T. |last4=White |first4=S. R. |last5=Scalapino |first5=D. J. |last6=Sugar |first6=R. L.}}</ref>
* [[Nuclear physics]] — It prevents the ''[[ab initio]]'' calculation of properties of [[nuclear matter]] and hence limits our understanding of [[atomic nucleus|nuclei]] and [[neutron star]]s.
* [[Quantum field theory]] — It prevents the use of [[lattice QCD]]<ref>{{Cite journal |author=de Forcrand, Philippe |title=Simulating QCD at finite density |journal=Pos Lat |volume=010 |pages=010 |year=2010 |arxiv=1005.0539 |bibcode=2010arXiv1005.0539D}}</ref> to predict the phases and properties of [[quark matter]].<ref name='Philipsen'>{{cite journal |last=Philipsen |first=O. |year=2008 |title=Lattice calculations at non-zero chemical potential: The QCD phase diagram
==The sign problem in field theory==
Line 57:
The sign problem is [[NP-hard]], implying that a full and generic solution of the sign problem would also solve all problems in the complexity class NP in polynomial time.<ref>{{Cite journal |arxiv=cond-mat/0408370 |doi=10.1103/PhysRevLett.94.170201 |pmid=15904269 |bibcode=2005PhRvL..94q0201T |title=Computational Complexity and Fundamental Limitations to Fermionic Quantum Monte Carlo Simulations |journal=Physical Review Letters |volume=94 |issue=17 |pages=170201 |year=2005 |last1=Troyer |first1=Matthias |last2=Wiese |first2=Uwe-Jens }}</ref> If (as is generally suspected) there are no polynomial-time solutions to NP problems (see [[P versus NP problem]]), then there is no ''generic'' solution to the sign problem. This leaves open the possibility that there may be solutions that work in specific cases, where the oscillations of the integrand have a structure that can be exploited to reduce the numerical errors.
In systems with a moderate sign problem, such as field theories at a sufficiently high temperature or in a sufficiently small volume, the sign problem is not too severe and useful results can be obtained by various methods, such as more carefully tuned reweighting, analytic continuation from imaginary <math>\mu</math> to real <math>\mu</math>, or Taylor expansion in powers of <math>\mu</math>.<ref name='Philipsen'/><ref>{{Cite journal |arxiv=hep-lat/0610116 |last1=Schmidt |first1=Christian |title=Lattice QCD at Finite Density |journal=Pos Lat |volume=021 |pages=21.1 |year=2006|bibcode=2006slft.confE..21S }}</ref>
There are various proposals for solving systems with a severe sign problem:
Line 64:
* [[Stochastic quantization]]. The sum over configurations is obtained as the equilibrium distribution of states explored by a complex [[Langevin equation]]. So far, the algorithm has been found to evade the sign problem in test models that have a sign problem but do not involve fermions.<ref>{{cite journal |doi=10.1103/PhysRevLett.102.131601 |pmid=19392346 |arxiv=0810.2089 |bibcode=2009PhRvL.102m1601A |title=Can Stochastic Quantization Evade the Sign Problem? The Relativistic Bose Gas at Finite Chemical Potential |journal=Physical Review Letters |volume=102 |issue=13 |pages=131601 |year=2009 |last1=Aarts |first1=Gert}}</ref>
* Fixed-node method. One fixes the ___location of nodes (zeros) of the multiparticle wavefunction, and uses Monte Carlo methods to obtain an estimate of the energy of the ground state, subject to that constraint.<ref>{{cite journal |doi=10.1103/PhysRevLett.72.2442 |pmid=10055881 |bibcode=1994PhRvL..72.2442V |title=Fixed-Node Quantum Monte Carlo Method for Lattice Fermions |journal=Physical Review Letters |volume=72 |issue=15 |pages=2442–2445 |year=1994 |last1=Van Bemmel |first1=H. J. M. |last2=Ten Haaf |first2=D. F. B. |last3=Van Saarloos |first3=W. |last4=Van Leeuwen |first4=J. M. J. |last5=An |first5=G. |hdl=1887/5478}}</ref>
* Majorana algorithms. Using Majorana fermion representation to perform Hubbard-Stratonovich transformations can help to solve the fermion sign problem of a class of fermionic many-body models.<ref>{{cite journal |doi=10.1103/PhysRevB.91.241117 |arxiv=1408.2269 |bibcode=2015PhRvB..91x1117L |title=Solving the fermion sign problem in quantum Monte Carlo simulations by Majorana representation |journal=Physical Review B |volume=91 |issue=24 |pages=241117 |year=2015 |last1=Li |first1=Zi-Xiang |last2=Jiang |first2=Yi-Fan |last3=Yao |first3=Hong}}</ref><ref>{{Cite journal |doi=10.1103/PhysRevLett.117.267002 |pmid=28059531 |arxiv=1601.05780 |bibcode=2016PhRvL.117z7002L |title=Majorana-Time-Reversal Symmetries: A Fundamental Principle for Sign-Problem-Free Quantum Monte Carlo Simulations |journal=Physical Review Letters |volume=117 |issue=26 |pages=267002 |year=2016 |last1=Li |first1=Zi-Xiang |last2=Jiang |first2=Yi-Fan |last3=Yao |first3=Hong}}</ref>
==See also==
| |||