Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Crystal (programming language): Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
Relisting discussion (XFDcloser) |
Prosfilaes (talk | contribs) offer cites |
||
Line 14:
<div class="xfd_relist" style="border-top: 1px solid #AAA; border-bottom: 1px solid #AAA; padding: 0px 25px;"><span style="color: #FF6600;">'''{{resize|91%|[[Wikipedia:Deletion process#Relisting discussions|Relisted]] to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.}}'''</span><br />
<small>Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, <span class="smallcaps" style="font-variant:small-caps;">[[User:Northamerica1000|North America]]<sup>[[User talk:Northamerica1000|<span style="font-size: x-small;">1000</span>]]</sup></span> 07:49, 12 July 2019 (UTC)</small><!-- from Template:Relist --><noinclude>[[Category:Relisted AfD debates|Crystal (programming language)]]</noinclude></div><!-- Please add new comments below this line -->
* '''Keep'''; I think it's clear this is a valid AFD. I'd say it's a pretty bad sign when a page about a computer language that has no historical importance doesn't bring any one to actually defend it. However, doing the Google News search, CBR Online (link blocked?) has an overview, [https://sdtimes.com/softwaredev/sd-times-news-digest-google-acquires-looker-ionics-capacitor-1-0-release-and-crystal-0-29-0-released/ SDTimes] has several small pieces on Crystal updates, [https://www.infoworld.com/article/3112012/3-new-programming-languages-what-their-creators-say.html InfoWorld] has a couple articles that go into some detail on Crystal as part of roundup of new languages. Pragmatic Bookshelf published ''Programming Crystal'' (ISBN 9781680502862) by Simon St. Laurent and Ivo Balbaert, neither of whom are developers. It's not far, but it seems over the line.--[[User:Prosfilaes|Prosfilaes]] ([[User talk:Prosfilaes|talk]]) 08:20, 12 July 2019 (UTC)
| |||