Content deleted Content added
→Inaccurate -- should be updated to current devices: new section |
|||
Line 8:
Regarding the importance of articles like this one, which is implicitly questioned in the box at the top of this page, those of us working with the hardware find Wikipedia's articles on CUDA devices ''extremely'' valuable. They provide a coherent, readable summary of what the terminology means and what various devices can do in a way that no other source I've seen does. (If it weren't for the value of articles like this, I would never have noticed the 512/1024 glitch -- I was looking something up when I stumbled across that.) This particular article, on the other hand, does seem to be a bit of a backwater; it's possible that it could reasonably be merged into one of the other (extremely useful) NVIDIA/CUDA articles. [[User:Salaw|Salaw]] ([[User talk:Salaw|talk]]) 19:16, 19 July 2019 (UTC)
:A little "original research" supported the article's assertion that all threads in a block are restricted to running within a single SM. However, the assertion still needs a citation (and I'm still not sure where that's documented) so the 'citation needed' tag should stay there. [[User:Salaw|Salaw]] ([[User talk:Salaw|talk]]) 23:42, 19 July 2019 (UTC)
| |||