Content deleted Content added
CanisRufus (talk | contribs) m RedWolf - bypassing redirect: CPU |
ease of coding vs. efficiency |
||
Line 2:
The word "high" does not imply that the language is superior to [[low-level programming language]]s but rather refers to the higher level of abstraction from machine language. For example: the difference between the programming language [[Java programming language|Java]] and [[assembly]] language is that Java abstracts programming functionality that assembly does not, for example, strings.
In general, high-level languages make complex programming simpler, while low-level languages produce more efficient code. In a high-level language, complex elements can be broken up into simpler, though still fairly complex, elements for which the language provides abstractions, keeping programmers from having to "reinvent the wheel." The cost of this convenience is often less efficient code overall. For this reason, code which needs to run particularly quickly and efficiently may be written in a lower-level language, even if a higher-level language would make the coding easier.
Note that the terms "high-level" and "low-level" are inherently relative. Originally, [[assembly]] language was considered low-level and [[COBOL]], [[C]], etc. were considered high-level. Many programmers today might refer to these latter languages as low-level. For more on this distinction, see the external link below.
== External link ==
* http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?HighLevelLanguage - The [[WikiWikiWeb]]'s article on high-level programming languages
[[es:Lenguaje de alto nivel]]
| |||