Content deleted Content added
→HJSON: A useful compromise between JSON and YAML: Not enough for a full article, but I think I can add a sentence to JSON |
|||
Line 169:
Not having HJSON on this page makes the Wikipedia a worse place, because it deprives its readers from knowing about a perfectly useful serialization format which has some features JSON lacks (comments, multi-line strings) while not having the complexity of YAML. As per [[WP:NNC]], this content should be restored. No, I have no relation to HJSON, except that it’s a useful data format I wish I knew about earlier. [[User:Samboy|Samboy]] ([[User talk:Samboy|talk]]) 19:56, 13 August 2019 (UTC)
:This is a comparison of stuff that already has a Wikipedia article. We shouldn't add external links. - [[User:MrOllie|MrOllie]] ([[User talk:MrOllie|talk]]) 20:12, 13 August 2019 (UTC)
::HJSON doesn’t have enough stuff in books or magazines to make a full article, but I think we can add a sentence mentioning it to the [[JSON]] article because of {{cite book|last1=Edelman|first1=Jason|last2=Lowe|first2=Scott|last3=Oswalt|first3=Matt|title=Network Programmability and Automation|publisher=[[O'Reilly Media]]|quote=for data representation you can pick one of the following: YAML, YAMLEX, JSON, JSON5, HJSON, or even pure Python}} [[User:Samboy|Samboy]] ([[User talk:Samboy|talk]]) 20:27, 13 August 2019 (UTC)
| |||