Content deleted Content added
→HJSON: A useful compromise between JSON and YAML: Not enough for a full article, but I think I can add a sentence to JSON |
→HJSON: A useful compromise between JSON and YAML: Added comment. |
||
Line 170:
:This is a comparison of stuff that already has a Wikipedia article. We shouldn't add external links. - [[User:MrOllie|MrOllie]] ([[User talk:MrOllie|talk]]) 20:12, 13 August 2019 (UTC)
::HJSON doesn’t have enough stuff in books or magazines to make a full article, but I think we can add a sentence mentioning it to the [[JSON]] article because of {{cite book|last1=Edelman|first1=Jason|last2=Lowe|first2=Scott|last3=Oswalt|first3=Matt|title=Network Programmability and Automation|publisher=[[O'Reilly Media]]|quote=for data representation you can pick one of the following: YAML, YAMLEX, JSON, JSON5, HJSON, or even pure Python}} [[User:Samboy|Samboy]] ([[User talk:Samboy|talk]]) 20:27, 13 August 2019 (UTC)
:::I didn't claim that Hjson is a "user interface format", I claimed it is a "user interface", period. Just see the title of hjson.org, which states "Hjson, a user interface for JSON". The comparison to YAML is flawed, since YAML is a data-serialization format, while Hjson doesn't even claim to be one. Likening Hjson to the programming language Python isn't helping the case. Shall we include Python in the list as well? I have yet to see anything that makes Hjson noteworthy in either this article or the JSON article. It's great that you have found a UI to JSON that you like, but Wikipedia is not a [[WP:LINKFARM|linkfarm]]. [[Special:Contributions/185.213.154.172|185.213.154.172]] ([[User talk:185.213.154.172|talk]]) 20:43, 13 August 2019 (UTC)
| |||