Revision as of 21:35, 13 August 2019 edit 185.213.154.172 (talk) →HJSON: A useful compromise between JSON and YAML: Added clarification. ← Previous edit		Revision as of 22:20, 13 August 2019 edit undo 185.213.154.172 (talk) →HJSON: A useful compromise between JSON and YAML: Added suggestion for possible future mention of Hjson. Next edit →
Line 175: :::::Continuing the Python comparison (which also answers your deleted comment): Including Hjson in a [[serialization]] format discussion, is like including Python instead of Pickle. [[Special:Contributions/185.213.154.172\|185.213.154.172]] ([[User talk:185.213.154.172\|talk]]) 21:32, 13 August 2019 (UTC) :::::By YAML being a standard, I was referring to how exceedingly common it is. I.e. a de facto standard. [[Special:Contributions/185.213.154.172\|185.213.154.172]] ([[User talk:185.213.154.172\|talk]]) 21:34, 13 August 2019 (UTC) :::::I agree with MrOllie above. I would like to add that when an article for Hjson exists, and the [[configuration file]] format is shown to be noteworthy, it seems like it would best fit in the "See also" section of the JSON article, under "Related formats". [[Special:Contributions/185.213.154.172\|185.213.154.172]] ([[User talk:185.213.154.172\|talk]]) 22:20, 13 August 2019 (UTC)

Talk:Comparison of data-serialization formats: Difference between revisions