Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Green (programming language): Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
Closing debate, result was no consensus |
Citation bot (talk | contribs) m Add: year, pages, issue, volume, journal, title, author pars. 1-1. Formatted dashes. | You can use this bot yourself. Report bugs here.| Activated by User:Chris Capoccia | Category:Pages with citations lacking titles. |
||
Line 12:
I found zero sources for this programming language. [[User:Joe Chill|Joe Chill]] ([[User talk:Joe Chill|talk]]) 12:35, 16 May 2010 (UTC)
*<small class="delsort-notice">'''Note''': This debate has been included in the [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Computing|list of Computing-related deletion discussions]]. <!--Template:Deletion sorting--></small> <small>-- [[User:Joe Chill|Joe Chill]] ([[User talk:Joe Chill|talk]]) 12:36, 16 May 2010 (UTC)</small>
*'''Delete'''. I found the primary source for this, {{cite journal|doi=10.1016/j.cl.2005.07.001|title=The Green language|journal=Computer Languages, Systems & Structures|volume=32|issue=4|pages=203–215|year=2006|last1=Guimarães|first1=José de Oliveira}}, but it has only 16 citations [http://scholar.google.com/scholar?cites=11702913881211335444&hl=en&as_sdt=2000] so far in Google scholar, and most of them are self-citations; [[CiteSeerX]] only found two citations, both self- [http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/summary?doi=10.1.1.88.3064]; 0 citations in ACM's digital library [http://portal.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=1646595]. The wiki page was written by the paper/language's author, [[User talk:Josedeoliveiraguimaraes]]. Wasn't able to find any other coverage. [[User:Pohta ce-am pohtit|Pcap]] [[User_talk:Pohta ce-am pohtit|<small>ping</small>]] 09:36, 17 May 2010 (UTC)
* '''Keep'''. Multiple publications about this language in reliable peer-reviewed academic journals. I see no requirement in [[WP:N]] that those publications are themselves cited in other publications. As the journals are peer reviewed, the publications cannot be considered as non-independent of the authors of the language. Also, speaking as a computer scientist, its type system sounds somewhat interesting, and it is the kind of thing we should probably keep a basic article on just as an example of variations on the normal way of doing things. [[User:JulesH|JulesH]] ([[User talk:JulesH|talk]]) 20:33, 19 May 2010 (UTC)
<hr style="width:50%;" />
| |||