Content deleted Content added
→Advocacy: reverted, due to disruption |
|||
Line 72:
::::LOL! So sorry...its the purple font dude! Made me think of Martina ;-) [[User:Rimmers|Rimmers]] 17:55, 1 December 2006 (UTC)
:::::Haha ok - it goes purple when the pages linked are visited (by default, it's blue
:)). <strong>[[User:Martinp23|M]][[User:Martinp23/Esperanza|<font color="green">a</font>]][[User_talk:Martinp23|rtinp23]]</strong> 18:16, 1 December 2006 (UTC)
:::For now, I've reverted STFVLGUY2's edits, the main reason being for maintenance reasons - if edits were made to the newly created redirect page, it's made about a million times harder to fix! Furthermore, so that nothing similar happens again, I've put move protection on the article. In the circumstances, I've followed [[WP:0RR]] (also known as [[Wikipedia:Revert only when necessary]]) to the best extent possible, which unfortunately was to revert completely (due to the disruptive nature of the edits, and the lack of [[GDFL]] attribution on the Bunton move). STFVLGUY2: your edits were along the lines of an unapproved [[WP:FORK]], and were completely against consensus. Also, you made a move without (read: completely against) the existing consensus, and a move which was actually disruptive to readers. Please remember: Wikipedia is there for its readers, and not for someone's personal agenda. Now, the considered consensus here is to follow the Angels model (as has been done) - going against that consensus without discussion is disruptive. So, '''please discuss!''' <strong>[[User:Martinp23|M]][[User:Martinp23/Esperanza|<font color="green">a</font>]][[User_talk:Martinp23|rtinp23]]</strong> 18:16, 1 December 2006 (UTC)
==Clark single sleeve==
|