Revision as of 17:34, 11 April 2019 edit GB11111 (talk \| contribs) 13 edits m Corrected SysML forum FAQ page to https://sysmlforum.com/sysml-faq/ ← Previous edit		Revision as of 18:40, 14 September 2019 edit undo 76.14.177.206 (talk) Minor edits: one for grammar (most English would use "small" for comparison, not "little") and one for flow (it doesn't just measure smaller, it _is_ smaller) Next edit →
Line 8: * SysML's semantics are more flexible and expressive. SysML reduces UML's software-centric restrictions and adds two new diagram types, requirement and parametric diagrams. The former can be used for [[requirements engineering]]; the latter can be used for [[Profiling (computer programming)\|performance analysis]] and [[Statistics\|quantitative analysis]]. Consequent to these enhancements, SysML is able to model a wide range of systems, which may include hardware, software, information, processes, personnel, and facilities. * SysML is a comparatively ~~little~~small language that is easier to learn and apply.<ref>Embedded Systems Security. By David Kleidermacher, Mike Kleidermacher. Elsevier, 2012. Pg 180.</ref> Since SysML removes many of UML's software-centric constructs, the overall language ~~measures~~is smaller both in diagram types and total constructs. * SysML allocation tables support common kinds of allocations. Whereas UML provides only limited support for tabular notations, SysML furnishes flexible allocation tables that support requirements allocation, functional allocation, and structural allocation. This capability facilitates automated [[verification and validation]] (V&V) and gap analysis. * SysML model management constructs support models, views, and viewpoints. These constructs extend UML's capabilities and are architecturally aligned with [[IEEE-Std-1471-2000]] (IEEE Recommended Practice for Architectural Description of Software Intensive Systems).

Systems modeling language: Difference between revisions