Revision as of 03:55, 5 September 2019 edit Lowercase sigmabot III (talk \| contribs) Bots, Page movers 2,450,612 edits m Archiving 1 discussion(s) from Template talk:WPBannerMeta) (bot ← Previous edit		Revision as of 03:43, 15 September 2019 edit undo Lowercase sigmabot III (talk \| contribs) Bots, Page movers 2,450,612 edits m Archiving 1 discussion(s) from Template talk:WPBannerMeta) (bot Next edit →
Line 340: :{{replyto\|PC78}} The non-hooked method of setting up a note does indeed restrict you to {{para\|NOTE_SIZE}}, for a variant size you do need to use the hook form, {{para\|HOOK_NOTE\|{{tlf\|WPBannerMeta/hooks/notes\|...}}}}. --[[User:Redrose64\|<span style="color:#a80000; background:#ffeeee; text-decoration:inherit">Red</span>rose64]] 🌹 ([[User talk:Redrose64\|talk]]) 22:13, 5 August 2019 (UTC) ::Cheers, I guess I'll have to do that. Is there a reason why the template is set up this way? [[User:PC78\|PC78]] ([[User talk:PC78\|talk]]) 22:15, 5 August 2019 (UTC) == Should we maybe hide the importance-rating when an article is classified as "low-importance"? == Importance ratings are helpful for categorizing in the project, and the vast majority topics are of low importance, but I do feel a bit mean rating a biography or a well-written article as being "low-importance". I'm wondering if we should maybe just hide the importance rating when set to "low"? It doesn't seem like something that would affect the projects and might be more encouraging than seeing your article marked as being of little importance. – '''[[User:Þjarkur\|Thjarkur]]''' [[User talk:Þjarkur#\|(talk)]] 14:07, 4 August 2019 (UTC) :I don't see why we would do that. <span style="font-variant:small-caps; whitespace:nowrap;">[[User:Headbomb\|Headbomb]] {[[User talk:Headbomb\|t]] · [[Special:Contributions/Headbomb\|c]] · [[WP:PHYS\|p]] · [[WP:WBOOKS\|b]]}</span> 15:36, 6 August 2019 (UTC)

Module talk:WikiProject banner/Archive 11: Difference between revisions