Levels of processing model: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added
Citation bot (talk | contribs)
m Alter: url, title. Removed parameters. | You can use this bot yourself. Report bugs here.| Activated by User:Marianne Zimmerman
Monkbot (talk | contribs)
m Familiarity: Task 16: replaced (2×) / removed (0×) deprecated |dead-url= and |deadurl= with |url-status=;
Line 9:
 
===Familiarity===
A stimulus will have a higher [[Recollection|recall]] value if it is highly compatible with preexisting semantic structures (Craik, 1972). According to [[semantic network]] theories, this is because such a stimulus will have many connections to other encoded memories, which are activated based on closeness in semantic network structure.<ref>{{Cite journal|doi=10.3758/BF03210735 |journal=Psychonomic Bulletin & Review |last=Rhodes |first=MG |author2=Anastasi JS |title=The effects of a levels-of-processing manipulation on false recall |year=2000 |url=http://lamar.colostate.edu/~mrhodes/RA00.pdf |volume=7 |issue=1 |pages=158–62 |pmid=10780030 |deadurlurl-status=yesdead |archiveurl=https://web.archive.org/web/20080906162014/http://lamar.colostate.edu/~mrhodes/RA00.pdf |archivedate=2008-09-06 |df= }}</ref> This activation increases cognitive analysis, increasing the strength of the memory representation. The familiarity modifier has been tested in [[implicit memory]] experiments, where subjects report false memories when presented with related stimuli.<ref>{{cite journal|last=Toth |first=JP |year=1996 |title=Conceptual automaticity in recognition memory: Levels-of-processing effects on familiarity |journal=Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology |url=http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_qa3690/is_199603/ai_n8735087 |volume=50 |issue=1 |pmid=8653094 |pages=123–38 |doi=10.1037/1196-1961.50.1.123 |deadurlurl-status=yesdead |archiveurl=https://web.archive.org/web/20080124111249/http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_qa3690/is_199603/ai_n8735087 |archivedate=2008-01-24 |df= }}</ref>
 
===Specificity of processing===