Content deleted Content added
Rearranged one paragraph to two paragraphs for better readability. |
CambyGramby (talk | contribs) Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit |
||
Line 36:
Since so much of mathematics consists in discovering and exploiting patterns, it is perhaps not surprising that there should have arisen various set-denotational conventions that strike practitioners as obvious or natural—if sometimes only once the pattern has been pointed out.
One class
A second class is based on a strong logical relationship between a set and a particular integer. One example is the bracket notation, in which the set {{math|{1, ..., ''n''}}} of the first {{math|''n''}} positive integers is denoted by {{math|[''n'']}}. (As a related point, when endowed with the standard less-than-or-equal [[Relation (mathematics)|relation]] {{math|≤}}, the set {{math|[''n'']}} yields the [[poset]] denoted by {{math|'''''n'''''}}.) Another example arises from [[modular arithmetic]], where [[equivalence classes]] are denoted by <math>\bar{a}_n</math>, which may be understood to represent the set of integers that leave remainder {{math|''a''}} on division by {{math|''n''}}. Thus yet another notation for the set of even numbers is <math>\bar{0}_2</math>.
|