Content deleted Content added
No edit summary |
|||
Line 362:
We could do with sections on Oracle engineered systems, RAC and the like, but drawn from reliable independent sources and describing them, not telling people how to specify and use them. <b>[[user:JzG|Guy]]</b> <small>([[user talk:JzG|help!]])</small> 09:41, 1 October 2019 (UTC)
: You don't want marketing information nor technical information. What is left for a technical product like Oracle? A simple name like RDBMS is a technical acronym.
: What to say about the "Releases and versions" table ? It is full of technical information about the markee features and you refused to add references to the meaning of these features ...
: In addition, somebody from Dell like you who states "Oracle's website is a nightmare" without sourcing his statement must have grief against Oracle. This is not tolerable and seems to be a COI to me.
: I spent multiple days trying to accommodate all the Wikipedia processes talking to so many different Wikipedia people with different opinions, only to see someone coming out of the blue and discarding content based on his own dictatorial principles (see all edits already attempted on this talk page and history). This is against the basic collaboration principles of open source projects like Wikipedia.
[[User:JFVerrier|JFVerrier]] ([[User talk:JFVerrier|talk]]) 13:44, 1 October 2019 (UTC)JFVerrier
| |||