Open-fields doctrine: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added
Line 170:
 
===''State v. Johnson''===
{{Infobox court case
 
|name = State v. Johnson
|court = [[Washington Court of Appeals]], Division Two
|full name = State of Washington v. Tamara Sue Johnson and James Raymond Johnson
|date decided = {{start date|1994|09|07|df=us}}
|citations = 75 Wn. App. 692, 879 P.2d 984
|judges = Alexander, Morgan and Houghton
|number of judges = 3
|decision by = Alexander
|prior actions = criminal trial
|appealed from = Thurston County Superior Court
|appealed to = [[Washington Supreme Court]]
|subsequent actions = Review denied, 126 Wn.2d 1004 (1995)
|opinions = Alexander
|keywords = {{hlist | search | seizure }}
|italic title = no
}}
Again, as ''Scott'' was reaching the New York Court of Appeals, another marijuana growing investigation across the country again gave rise to a state court's rejection of the open-fields doctrine. This case involved the additional question of whether federal involvement negated any state consideration of the issue.<ref name="State v. Johnson">{{Cite court|litigants=State v. Johnson|vol=75|reporter=Wn.App.|opinion=692|court=[[Washington Court of Appeals#Division II|Wn.App.Div.II]]|date=1994|url=https://scholar.google.com/scholar_case?case=239546820780301962|accessdate=September 20, 2019}}</ref>